Analysis on Materialism and Pink Flamingo Essay

Materialism coarsens and petrifies everything, making everything rank, and every accuracy false. These profound words spoken by Swiss philosopher Henri Amiel illustrate the wretched obscenity and dilettantishity of the virus-like spread of physicalism. In the prove entitled The Pink Flamingo A vivid History by Jennifer set, monetary value examines the popularity of the well-known ping flamingo and how it relates to the ideals and whims of American refining. Using American spell of the ductile, pink flamingo as her medium, Jennifer cost shows her evident disdain for the superficial physicalism display in American confederacy.Jennifer terms introduces her analysis of the flamingo fad by presenting the ascent of the pink flamingo in American stopping stopover and how society reacted upon the popularization of this ethnic icon. impairment effectively illustrates the American publics reaction to the introduction of the elastic, pink flamingo by implementing specific diction that reinforces her own opinions of the flamingo extend. Similar to a head teacherless sheepfold of birds following each other with come in more(prenominal) than thought as to why, terms writes that Since the 1930s, vacation Americans had been smokeing to Florida and returning home with flamingo souvenirs. footings choice to describe Americans as flocking is meant to certify a coincidence to a flock of mindless birds in effect, the spring characterizes Americans as bandwagon followers who neediness any term for the examination of their culture and the conceptual point arsehole their emblematic icons.The author besides presents how Americans do rendered the pliable, pink flamingo as tokenic of riches and luxury. set states that In the 1910s and 1920s, Miami lands first grand hotel, the Flamingo, had do the bird synonymous with wealth and pizzazz. In the context of the bear witness, terms like wealth and pizzazz possess a sh everyow, superficial con no nation that consequently translates into the flamingo as not only being a symbol of wealth and pizzazz but in any case a symbol of superficiality and vulgar ostentation. impairments introductory split up is significant to the purpose of the experiment because it illustrates the magnitude of the flamingo fascination and how Americans irrationally react to the flamingos popularity.In reiteration of determines stance, heavy check in the screen of the plasticflamingos intrinsic organization simply because it represents an exotic creature depicts Prices severe disdain for the whims of American society. Price utilizes an ironic circumstance in conjunction with historic examine when she attempts to shit a connection between real(a) flamingos and plastic flamingos. Americans, Price points out, had hunted flamingos to defunctness in Florida in the late 1800s, for plumes and meat. just now no matter. In the 1950s, the new interstates would earn working-class tourists down, besides. Price bluntly uses facts and historical research about American culture to express her disgust of the irony that the American nation has created for itself with guesss to the plastic, pink flamingo. When Price writes nevertheless no matter, she reinforces the implication that it is as if American society regards the destruction of the flamingo as futile because capitalist society would benefit more from the production of plastic flamingos that could yield r stock-stillue.Thus, a nation that embraces the flamingo in all its looker after having been so destructive of the graphic population reveals the ironic cargonlessness and prevarication of American society. Furthermore, Price uses the image of the pink flamingo with its natural boldness to emphasize her point about the ignorance of Americans and their culture. The author states, The bird acquired an pointless fillip of boldness, too, from the direction of Las Vegas withFlamingo Hotel. Anyone who has seen Las Vegas knows that a flamingo stands out in a desert even more strikingly than on a lawn.The unsophisticated fact that a flamingo is a subtropical animal unfit to decease in the desert gives Price the defense to illustrate how Americans took the flamingo fad to such radical heights without giving one regard to the appropriateness of the flamingo in context. In doing so, Price once again conveys the total ignorance and lack of consideration that characterizes American society. The paragraph in which Price asserts her belief regarding the ironic situation American society has put itself in supports a belief that Americans have understand their obsession so far as to having destroyed a population of animals for the pursuit of wealth and luxury thus, the pink flamingo, in the context of Prices prove, is that a symbol of the vulgar materialism Americans possess because of their ignorance and inconsideration for the appropriateness of destroying flamingos and plasticizing them.Jennifer Price provides further details regarding the plastic flamingos image which forces the reader to question if the plastic flamingo is even close to being a valid representation of its real-life counterpart. Prices use of imagery in her essay and the interpretation that follows shows that she believes the plastic flamingo is obviously not even fit to represent the truthful(p) flamingo. Price lists the colorise, tangerine, broiling magenta, bloodless pink, incarnadine, fuchsia demure, congou tea ruby, methyl green, in order to construct images that overwhelm the readers mind with bold colors. The extremely bold colors of the plastic flamingo such as livid pink and broiling magenta develop the conclusion that the plastic flamingo could never be synonymous with the quiet, demure brilliancy of a real flamingo.Thus, once the reader has interpreted the color imagery and concluded that all of the colors argon just too much, the reader can mend the connection that society is in additi on too much obsessed with putting on pretenses of wealth as opposed to commission on issues that really matter such as the preservation of the real flamingo. Price also makes use of repetition in order to express the magnitude of the plastic flamingos color in society. Jennifer Price states, Washing machines, cars, and kitchen counters proliferated in passion pink, sunset pink, and Bermuda pink. By stating that the pink fad present in the plastic flamingo was also transferred into syndicate appliances such as washing machines and kitchen counters, Price implies that the materialism and vulgarity of fronting flush spread into the home the infiltration of materialism into the home meant that the desire for wealth and fervency had also infiltrated the aspects of American life.Prices criticism of the flamingos color fascination supports the essays idea that Americans are only satisfied by boldness and extravagance as evident in the pink coloration of household appliances because pi nk was the color of the symbolic pink flamingo of wealth Americans, thus, have difficulty equating reticence and demureness with any phase of wealth. The simple belief is that extravagance and flamboyance are the way to go if one wants to appear wealthy. Americans who desire wealth are and so subject to the whims of materialism and superficiality.The author concludes by delivering an argument that criticizes American views and ideals, or the lack of, as being disrespectful and offend towards the consequence of the flamingo itself. Jennifer Price uses cultural evidence from other nations to present the importance of the flamingo. She states, pluralityhave always singled out the flamingo as special. Early Christians associated it with the red phoenix. In past Egypt, it symbolized the sun god Ra. In Mexico and the Caribbean, it trunk a major motif in art, dance, and literature. The author uses these facts to justify that the reduction of the undimmed flamingo in American cultur e to a mere plastic souvenir given up to grass is a shameful comparison to other cultures that respect nature and hero-worship the bird as a storied symbol.Price then makes use of commensurateness in order to strengthen her criticism of American culture. In the essay, Price states, No wonder that the subtropical species stood out so loudly when Americans in temperate vernal England reproduced it, brightened it, and sent it wading across an upcountry sea of grass. By using retell sentence structures through parallelism, Price emphasizes that Americans have done so many things to the flamingo that the plastic version is so far upstage from its original counterpart. Thus, Americans have lost pile of the intended genuine meaning behind embracing the flamingo in the first place. The significance of this section within the essay is classic because it not only allows the author to go beyond criticism of the flamingo, but it also shows that, in the grand scheme of things, Price was more intent on exposing and criticizing the true validity of all American cultural values.Jennifer Price allegorized the fascination of the plastic flamingo in order to establish a sort of comparison between obsession with buying plastic flamingos that symbolize wealth and the materialism evident in American culture. Although the essay mostly depicts American society as insensitive and inconsiderate according to the authors tone, the satirical nature of the essay provides a subtle, underlying, hopeful connotation that by chance one day American society will learn to go beyond their materialistic greed and ascend to a different type of wealth.BibliographyJennifer Prices essay The Plastic Pink Flamingo A Natural History